`Overview of Intellectual Property`
(Litigation in Japan)
Example 1.
P EEE@patent holder
A EEE alleged patent infringer
@
<1st Step>
(A) P sends a warning letter to A where describing;
A is to be infringing P's patent.EEEEE P has both policies of amicable resolution and legal resolution like litigation.
Note: Althogh, warning letter is not the compulsory condition to initiate the subsequent patent litigation in Japan, it is commonly better to take such action. |
Preliminary injunction takes rather shorter time than permanent injunction, around 6 months to one year depending on each case. P must deposit certain amount of bond which undertakes A's damages in case of disadvantage of P.
In addition, P is not able to seek damages under the preliminary injunction procedure.
(B) A responses to the warning letter within a reasonable term.
Note: Usually, the term is around 10 days. However, if A has to review the matter precisely, A may ask to extend around one month for substantial preparation for the answer. |
<2nd Step>
P files with the court to seek a preliminary injunction of manufacture/sales of A, or permanent injunction same.
Note: Whether P choices is very delicate and strategical to determine for patentee. It's depending on each case, where P may consult with legal professional counselor who has various experiences of cases. |
¨@flowchart & time schedule of patent litigation (unofficial)
@
@
oπ/μ₯_Ά Ζ±ΰe mIΰY ΖΝH @ό³|[g ±Δΰ @₯ΦWNW
@
(C) 2006 Takayoshi Sagaye. All rights reserved. @
@
@
@